Greetings Citizens.
I have been reading a book called Illuminations, Women Writing on Photography from the 1850's to the Present, edited by Liz Heron and Val Williams. Over the last few nights I've been reading an article by Jan Zita Grover entitled Dykes in Context: Some Problems in Minority Representation. In it were the usual comparisons of male generated images of lesbians and those made by lesbian women. But there was more to the article than that. In particular, I found the discussion of formal elements being over-stated in academia with little emphasis on the context of the imagery of significant importance at the expense of giving little thought to the representation an images presents to us as viewers. How a photographer can create images as a sign or as an argument and how little that can be discussed in an art class critic. I'm afraid I agree with her. I have seen (and heard) far too many instructors of photography ignore the importance of what the image (and photographer) are saying while spending far too much time talking about line, shape, form, etc.. Now don't get me wrong, I feel very strongly that craft is an important element in the making of a good image. But I feel that the content is equally, if not more, important. And this is where I feel it is important for the photographer to make images of things that are important to him/her. And I don't think the reasons need to be earth-shattering. I mean look at my most recent bodies of work... anti-graffiti and scrap metal. Not the kind of subject matter that will change the publics' consciousness. But enough to keep me engaged. I have my reasons for photographing this work... you'll have to buy me Thai food to hear my reasons... and I won't go into it here. The point is that I have an active interest in my subject. Another important point made by Ms. Grover is how images made by a subculture (and I think here you can add just about anyone anymore) is viewed differently within the subculture than the mainstream culture. To me this is an important thing to keep in mind during a critique. Important for the viewer to hear what the images are representing to the audience... and to know who that audience is. You will certainly get different responses if you show your work to your friends than if you show the same work to strangers. I just think this is important to keep in the back of your mind. Okay, I'm getting a little carried away and the topic is beyond the scope of my daily rants so I'll leave it at that. Post a comment and we'll discuss it more, if you wish.